Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for January, 2011

IT NEVER HAD A CHANCE TO BE SOLD

Today’s post covers fraud and theft of stock items before they are sold or used in your establishment.  These types of fraud relate to purchasing, receiving and inventory stock keeping.  Subsequent posts will cover additional types of fraud and theft.  These posts discuss one of the most important issues facing restaurateurs. 

Any theft of product for sale can result in significant sales and income tax liabilities.  So significant, in fact, that it could put your restaurant or bar out of business.  My restaurant tax blog, Canadian Restaurant Tax Advisor, has a wealth of information about restaurant tax audits and their dire implications for you.

Supplier Fraud & Theft

While most suppliers are reputable, some aren’t.  During the recent recession, many suppliers experienced financial difficulties.  Financial pressures can increase the likelihood that suppliers will try to cheat their restaurant and bar customers.  Here are a few examples.

Short Shipping & Over-Pricing

Fraudulent suppliers can follow a practice of short shipping and over-pricing.  The cost to the restaurant can be significant, especially for high volume and/or high cost products, such as meats, seafood, dairy and dry goods.  The restaurant’s chef usually helps cover up this type of fraud, in return for kickbacks, including gifts, sports tickets and money.  If your chef mentions having good seats at a recent professional sports event, you have a theft problem.

Of course, not all such frauds involve your chef.  Some suppliers will short ship goods, occasionally.  You pay for the amount invoiced, but you don’t receive all of the products.  They get away with it, because you don’t check goods as they are received.  You need to verify the quantities and weights of products received to the invoiced items.  occasionally, suppliers will invoice for the amounts ordered, but write on the invoice that some of the items are on back order.  Management needs to be vigilant to make sure the missing items are received on the next delivery. 

Linen suppliers are notorious for consistently under-ship on weekly linen deliveries.  In one case, a linen supplier significantly under-delivered napkins and table cloths every week.  In some cases, the restaurant had to call the company for an emergency delivery of linen as they were about to run out.  The linen supplier invoiced the restaurant for the “additional” linen and for an emergency delivery charge!  Don’t let this happen to you.

Though this isn’t a fraud, linen companies will rarely tell you when you are ordering too much linen.  As a cost-conscious restaurateur, you need to monitor quantities delivered.  In several cases, I have found that significant “inventories” of napkins and table cloths built up in the restaurants, due to a decrease in customer counts.  The linen companies had not been notified to reduce their inventory and weekly deliveries to the restaurants.

Unauthorized Substitutions

Especially with food suppliers, you need to check the quality of each item received, to ensure that the supplier has not substituted inferior goods (at the superior quality price).  Some produce suppliers will try to deliver not-so-fresh vegetables that will soon end up in your waste bin.  The same thing happens quite regularly with “fresh” fish.  Also beware of previously frozen fish sold as “fresh”.  I strongly advise owners (and chefs) check every delivery and to return sub-standard products.  Not only will you not pay for inferior ingredients, you will be keeping your suppliers on their toes.

Some wine suppliers will make substitutions for the wines that were ordered.  The most common substitution is to deliver wines with a different vintage than the one ordered.  Always check invoice prices to the supplier’s price list.  A small price difference, multiplied by a large number of bottles, adds up quickly!

Coming in or going out?

Delivery & Takeout

When is a supplier delivery not a delivery?  When the delivery person takes stock on his way out!  If you don’t supervise the delivery person, at all times, stock can go out the door just as easily as it came in.  Also, make sure all goods received are promptly placed in their proper storage areas, to prevent delivery people from having easy access to your inventory.

Full kegs can be “returned” along with the empty ones.  Cases of beer, wine and liquor can be removed on trolleys and quickly sold to other restaurants, netting the delivery person a nice side-income.  High-value meats, seafood and dry goods are easy targets for unscrupulous delivery people.  Again, these items are easily saleable, if they aren’t consumed personally!

High-value supplies are also susceptible to being walked out the back door.  Boxed wine glasses are particularly good targets, but lesser value items like boxes of candles, take-out containers, boxes of condiments, and even toilet paper, can disappear from the shelves during “deliveries”.

Inventory Theft

Once supplies and products are in the door, your staff has an opportunity to grab a “deep discount”.  Allowing staff to bring knapsacks, sports bags, opaque plastic bags, and environmentally friendly totes gives them the perfect means to conceal and transport your stock out of the restaurant.  High-value, low bulk items are particularly good targets for these bandits. 

Staff tend to steal the items they need or want.  A server with a taste for Pinot Noir will tend to slip these wines into their knapsacks before leaving the restaurant.  Everyone needs food, so it shouldn’t be surprising if food items in inventory regularly go missing.

Some products don’t even have to be concealed.  A bold bartender can fill a bottled water container with almost half of a bottle of Belvedere vodka and walk out the front door with it in his hand.  Worse still, you won’t suspect this employee of theft, because you think that he or she doesn’t drink (or at least not much)!  It doesn’t have to be alcohol poured into water bottles, I’ve seen high-priced extra virgin olive oil and truffle oil “concealed” this way.  Staff who cycle to work often have opaque water bottles, which are even better at concealing stolen alcohol.

Dishonest employees can put saleable stock items into garbage bags, to be picked up after their shifts are over.  One way to combat this theft method is to periodically check the contents of garbage bags put out for collection.  Another, easier, way is to use clear garbage bags and inspect as many as possible during each shift.

Final Thoughts

This post covered some of the more important thefts and fraud involving inventory from receiving to safeguarding.  Subsequent posts will examine other types of fraud and theft in restaurants and bars.

Read Full Post »

Most restaurateurs know that theft is a problem in the hospitality industry, but very few know how much is going on in their own establishments. According to the U.S. National Restaurant Association, approximately 4% of all revenue is lost to in-house theft.  The latest figures from Statistics Canada, NPD Group and the CRFA, indicate that the average profit margin for Canadian restaurants was only 4.4% of operating revenue!  Based on these figures, approximately one-half of your profit is lost to employee theft.

As if that isn’t bad enough, the cost of missing alcohol is only half of the story.  Increasingly, restaurants and bars are learning that they have substantial tax liabilities resulting from stolen alcohol.  I urge you to learn more about this insidious practice, here.  It’s no wonder that 35% of restaurants fail because of employee theft!

With the help of Robert J. Quintero’s Masters thesis, The Theft of Alcohol in the Restaurant and Bar Industry, let’s take a closer look at employee theft in restaurants.  The author’s findings are based on a survey of 153 employees at 38 establishments in Lubbock, Texas.  While it is a bit dated (2001) and U.S-based, the major findings are likely to be reasonably similar in Canada.

Top 5 Types of Alcohol Theft

Based on an exploratory survey,  employees admitted to the following types of theft at some point during their employment.

  1. 69.7% provided free drinks to friends
  2. 56.6% took part in unauthorized drinking
  3. 52.4% over-poured drinks to increase their tips
  4. 41.4% failed to ring in all items ordered
  5. 40.7% took alcoholic drinks for their personal use.

STUDY FINDINGS

The study analysed the effects of various scenarios on three major categories of theft.

  1. Giving Alcohol” included giving free drinks to friends and customers.
  2. “Reciprocity” was the term given to theft by servers providing free drinks to other establishment servers in return for free drinks at their establishments.  Unauthorized drinks for the server and others at the employer establishment were also included.
  3. “Taking Cash” included cash theft, over-charging customers and short-changing customers.

Is Theft Reduced by an Automated Pouring System?

Pouring profit into his own pocket

No.  Even I was a bit surprised by this finding!  The study found no significant reduction of Giving Alcohol (52.3%) with an automated liquor or beer pouring system.  Similarly, there was no reduction in Reciprocity theft (79.1%).  It appears that management is not properly monitoring the automated pouring systems, and employees are still able to provide free drinks to themselves, co-workers, friends and servers at other establishments.

Do More Satisfied Employees Steal Less?

This has to be true, doesn’t it?  I mean, a happy employee wouldn’t want to steal, right?  Wrong! The study found that Giving Alcohol and Reciprocity theft were not related to job satisfaction (although happy employees were less likely to Take Cash).  As hard as it is to accept, your happiest employees are likely to be more loyal to their co-workers, their friends, and those that can give them free drinks elsewhere than they are to you, the owner.

The Effect on Theft of Allowing After-hours Staff Drinking

This finding didn’t surprise me at all.  Allowing staff to consume alcohol after-hours substantially increases the incidence of theft.  Giving Alcohol was much higher at 64.8% (vs. 45.5%).  Reciprocity theft was higher, too, 88.9% vs. 73.7%.  Even Taking Cash more than twice as high (16.7% vs. 7.1%).  If it isn’t obvious, allowing staff to consume alcohol after-hours costs much more than the cost of the alcohol consumed!

The Effect of Allowing Staff to Give Away Alcohol (Comps)

Allowing servers/bartenders to give away alcoholic drinks (without authorization) is a recipe for disaster.  No big surprise, here.  The incidence of Giving Alcohol was 71.4% vs. 49.2% where this was not allowed, and for Reciprocity theft the figures were 95.2% vs. 76.5%.  The moral of this story is to carefully monitor all customer comps.

Summary

While this paper doesn’t cover all aspects of bar theft, it does provide us with a few interesting, even surprising, insights.  Even your happiest employees are probably stealing from you.  The vast majority of your employees take part in “Reciprocity” theft – they’re more loyal to other establishment bartenders than they are to you.  Installing an automated pouring system will not reduce employee alcohol theft.

So, what can you do.  Supervise, supervise, supervise.  Do not let staff drink after-hours, at all.  Require every customer comp (free drink) is authorized by a manager, entered in the POS and recorded in a log or ledger.  Of course there are many more things you can do to reduce employee theft.  These are the ones that follow from this study’s findings.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.